Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sethu Iyer's avatar

Fun stuff, and now I'm all caught up.

I still see a logical issue with your notion that some spirits are evil. The problem is that if a spirit is evil, then either 1) it was determined from eternity to be evil, which is predestination, or 2) it was randomly "assigned" to be evil out of pure indeterminacy. And I don't consider either of these alternatives to be compatible with freedom. It seems to me that there is no way out of this conundrum, and that the problem is analytic in nature.

The specter of Indeterminacy in particular produces the need for spirits to have a determinate content of *some* kind, since otherwise there is no possible rationale for whatever they might choose to do or not.

So, I favor the notion that spirit as such is not purely indeterminate freedom but also an intrinsic inclination to draw closer to God—which would suggest that at the most fundamental level, spirits are good and have a built-in telos toward salvation. This option also doesn't allow for ultimate freedom to determine one's own nature. But I would suggest that such freedom can't exist anyway, since it would collapse into purely arbitrary indeterminacy, which would be the abolition of all freedom. (To meaningfully choose your own nature, you would have to do so by appeal to existing criteria, which are already part of your own determinate nature, and so on.)

Expand full comment
JP Misheff's avatar

Can you point to some writing (yours or not yours) that provides an appreciative investigation of dualism? I dont find myself on board with it but I’m also typically usually willing to look further

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts